Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Designing a multi-service healthcare network based on the impact of patients’ flow among medical services

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient location of medical services is an issue of paramount importance in healthcare strategic planning. In this research, a mathematical model is developed for the location of multi-service health centers, assuming probabilistic demand and service time. Since patients may be shifted to another service after receiving a service by doctors’ order, health system is considered a Jackson queueing network. We assume that patients have “probabilistic choice behavior” and the primary factors contributing to their choice of one center over another are their proximity to the center and the number of medical services offered by the center. The proposed mixed integer nonlinear programming model seeks to minimize the demand weighted total distance travelled by patients among their residential areas and health centers and also among health centers on the one hand, and the weighted sum of undesired deviations from standard arrival rates at service stations on the other hand. The location of health centers as well as the type of services they offer and the number of servers at each service station are the main determinants of the proposed model. Using the proposed model, we can predict patients’ choice patterns and their arrival rates at current or newly provided medical stations. Two heuristics are developed to solve medium and large instances of the proposed model. The computational results obtained from benchmark instances show that the GA-based heuristic is somewhat better than the heuristic based on remove–add-–exchange procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. General Algebraic Modeling System.

  2. Basic Open-source Nonlinear Mixed Integer programming.

References

  • Aboolian R, Berman O, Drezner Z (2008) Location and allocation of service units on a congested network. IIE Trans 40:422–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshari H, Peng Q (2014) Challenges and solutions for location of healthcare facilities. Ind Eng Manag 3(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Javid A, Seyedi P, Syam S S (2017) A survey of healthcare facility location. Comput Oper Res 79:223–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (1978) Reilly’s challenge: new laws of retail gravitation which define systems of central places. Environ Plan A 10:185–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beheshtifar S, Alimoahmmadi A (2015) A multi-objective optimization approach for location-allocation of clinics. Int Trans Oper Res 22(2):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneyan J, Musdal H, Ceyhan M, Shiner B, Watts B (2012) Specialty care single and multi-period location allocation models within the Veterans Health Administration. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 46:136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boffey B, Galvão R, Espejo L (2007) A review of congestion models in the location of facilities with immobile servers. Eur J Oper Res 178:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni M, Conforti D, Sicilia N, Trotta S (2006) A new organ transplantation location–allocation policy: a case study of Italy. Health Care Manag Sci 9:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church R, Revelle C (1974) The maximal covering location problem. Pap Reg Sci 32:101–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin M, Dean L (2004) Location of healthcare facilities. In: A handbook of methods and applications, 43–76

  • Gross M, Harris C (1985) Fundamentals of queueing theory, chapter 4: networks, series and cyclic queues, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 229–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Güneş ED, Nickel S (2015) Location problems in healthcare. In: Location science. Springer, Berlin, 555–579

  • Guo M, Zhang Z, Wua S, Song J (2013) Efficiency evaluation for allocating community-based health services. Comput Ind Eng 65:395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpera PR, Shahania AK, Gallagherb JE, Bowiec C (2005) Planning health services with explicit geographical considerations: a stochastic location–allocation approach. Omega 33:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huff D (1963) A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Econ 1:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Kim D (2013) A lagrangian heuristic algorithm for a public healthcare. Ann Oper Res 206:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Serra D (1998) Probabilistic maximal covering location-allocation for congested system. J Reg Sci 38:401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Serra D (2002) Location–allocation of multiple-server service centers with constrained queues or waiting times. Ann Oper Res 111(1–4):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Rıos M, Icaza M (2008) Facility location for market capture when users rank facilities by shorter travel and waiting times. Eur J Oper Res 191:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of quantitative choice behavior. In: Zarembkar P (ed) Frontiers in economics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Panwar M, Rathi K (2014) Social sustainability: contextual facility location planning model for multi-facility hierarchical healthcare system in India. Int J Appl Eng Res 9(3):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasandideh SHR, Niaki STA (2012) Genetic application in a facility location problem with random demand within queuing framework. J Intell Manuf 23:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle CS, Swain RW (1970) Central facilities location. Geogr Anal 2(1):30–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberto D, Galvao A, Gonzalo L, Acosta Espejo A, Boffey B (2002) A hierarchical model for the location of perinatal facilities in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro. Eur J Oper Res 138:495–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syam SS, Côte MJ (2010) A location allocation model for service providers with application to not-for-profit. Healthc Organ Omega 38:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira JC, Antunes AP (2008) A hierarchical location model for public facility planning. Eur J Oper Res 185:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toregas C (1970) A covering formulation for the location of public service facilities. M.S. thesis, Cornell University

  • Vidyarthi N, Kuzgunkaya O (2015) The impact of directed choice on the design of preventive healthcare facility network under congestion. Health Care Manag Sci 18(4):459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidyarthi N, Jayaswal S (2014) Efficient solution of a class of location–allocation problems with stochastic demand and congestion. Comput Oper Res 48:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Berman O, Verter V (2009) Incorporating congestion in preventive healthcare facility network design. Eur J Oper Res 198:922–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Berman O, Marcotte P, Verter V (2010) A bilevel model for preventive healthcare facility network design with congestion. IIE Trans 42(12):865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Berman D, Verter V (2012) The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design. OR Spectrum 34:349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Radman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radman, M., Eshghi, K. Designing a multi-service healthcare network based on the impact of patients’ flow among medical services. OR Spectrum 40, 637–678 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-018-0519-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-018-0519-1

Keywords

Navigation